考研閱讀真題練習

　　現如今，我們最少不了的就是練習題了，做習題有助于提高我們分析問(wèn)題和解決問(wèn)題的能力。一份好的習題都是什么樣子的呢？下面是小編幫大家整理的考研閱讀真題練習，希望能夠幫助到大家。

　　考研閱讀真題練習 1

　　In recent years, railroads have been combining with each other, merging into super systems, causing heightened concerns about monopoly. As recently as 1995, the top four railroads accounted for under 70 percent of the total ton-miles moved by rails. Next year, after a series of mergers is completed, just four railroads will control well over 90 percent of all the freight moved by major rail carriers.

　　Supporters of the new super systems argue that these mergers will allow for substantial cost reductions and better coordinated service. Any threat of monopoly, they argue, is removed by fierce competition from trucks. But many shippers complain that for heavy bulk commodities traveling long distances, such as coal, chemicals, and grain, trucking is too costly and the railroads therefore have them by the throat.

　　The vast consolidation within the rail industry means that most shippers are served by only one rail company. Railroads typically charge such captive shippers 20 to 30 percent more than they do when another railroad is competing for the business. Shippers who feel they are being overcharged have the right to appeal to the federal governments Surface Transportation Board for rate relief, but the process is expensive, time-consuming, and will work only in truly extreme cases.

　　Railroads justify rate discrimination against captive shippers on the grounds that in the long run it reduces everyones cost. If railroads charged all customers the same average rate, they argue, shippers who have the option of switching to trucks or other forms of transportation would do so, leaving remaining customers to shoulder the cost of keeping up the line. Its a theory to which many economists subscribe, but in practice it often leaves railroads in the position of determining which companies will flourish and which will fail. Do we really want railroads to be the arbiters of who wins and who loses in the marketplace? asks Martin Bercovici, a Washington lawyer who frequently represents shipper.

　　考研閱讀真題練習 2

　　In recent years, the "Town of Culture" award has emerged as a new initiative in the UKs cultural policy landscape. Proposed by cultural organizations, the award aims to recognize towns that demonstrate a commitment to cultural development while addressing local social issues. Unlike the well-established "City of Culture" title, which often focuses on large urban centers with existing cultural infrastructure, the "Town of Culture" is designed for smaller communities with limited resources.

　　Copper and her colleagues, who have studied the impact of such cultural awards, argue that the "Town of Culture" could be a game-changer for rural and semi-rural areas. They point out that while big cities can leverage their size to attract cultural investment, smaller towns often struggle to compete. The award, they suggest, would provide a much-needed boost by directing national attention and funding toward these communities. This, in turn, could stimulate local economies through increased tourism and job creation in cultural sectors.

　　Critics, however, have voiced concerns about the proposal. Some argue that the award is little more than a public relations stunt, as many towns lack the capacity to sustain cultural programs long-term. They warn that towns might divert funds from essential services like education and healthcare to win the title, only to abandon cultural projects once the spotlight fades. Others question whether the award will truly benefit local residents, or if it will primarily serve to promote the town as a tourist destination.

　　The author of this article notes that the success of such awards depends on how they are implemented. Drawing on the example of Glasgow, which won the "City of Culture" title in 1990, the author highlights that lasting impact comes not from one-off events but from sustained investment in community-based cultural initiatives. Glasgow used the award to revitalize neglected neighborhoods, train local artists, and build partnerships between cultural institutions and schools—changes that continued long after the title year ended.

　　For a "Town of Culture" to avoid becoming a fleeting trend, the author emphasizes the need for long-term planning. Towns should involve residents in designing cultural programs that reflect local needs and aspirations. Additionally, funding should be tied to measurable outcomes, such as increased participation in cultural activities or improved access to arts education for children. Only then, the author concludes, can the award fulfill its promise of fostering genuine cultural and social progress.

　　Copper and her colleagues argue that a "Town of Culture" award would ______

　　A. consolidate the town-city ties in Britain

　　B. promote cooperation among Britains towns

　　C. increase the economic strength of Britains towns

　　D. focus Britains limited resources on cultural events

　　According to paragraph 3, the proposal might be regarded by some as ______

　　A. a sensible compromise

　　B. a self-deceiving attempt

　　C. an eye-catching bonus

　　D. an inaccessible target

　　The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it ______

　　A. endeavors to maintain its image

　　B. meets the aspiration of its people

　　C. brings its local arts to prominence

　　D. commits to its long-term growth

　　"Glasgow" is mentioned in Paragraph 4 to present ______

　　A. a contrasting case

　　B. a supporting example

　　C. a background story

　　D. a related topic

　　What is the authors attitude towards the proposal?

　　A. Skeptical

　　B. Objective

　　C. Favorable

　　D. Critical

【考研閱讀真題練習】相關(guān)文章：

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀真題07-25

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀真題翻譯09-23

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀歷年真題09-21

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解真題07-15

2017考研英語(yǔ)閱讀真題08-03

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀翻譯真題09-14

2016英語(yǔ)閱讀真題考研09-08

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀真題及解析09-29

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀真題及答案07-03

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀真題答案解析10-17