- 相關(guān)推薦
腦中風(fēng)患者接受住院復健治療預后功能的研究
【關(guān) 鍵 詞】
腦中風(fēng)Stroke
預后Prognosis
功能結果Functional outcomes
復健治療Rehabilitation therapy
【論文類(lèi)別】 博士論文
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
【中文摘要】
本前瞻性研究目的主要調查與探討民國八十六年一月至十二月期間163位住院高雄醫學(xué)大學(xué)
附設中和醫院復健科接受復健治療的腦中風(fēng)患者，其社會(huì )人口學(xué)及住院期間診斷評估臨床
數據、其復健治療效益性、出院時(shí)日常生活功能預后進(jìn)步情形和相關(guān)預測因子、影響住院
天數長(cháng)短的預測因子、出院至少六個(gè)月預后功能獨立自主和使用長(cháng)期照護機構的影響因素
和生活型態(tài)改變的情形。
我們的研究結果顯示：日常生活能力以功能獨立自主量表(Functional Independence
Measure, FIM)分數為指標，在住院期間無(wú)論全部項目得分或其六大類(lèi)別得分的進(jìn)步量在統
計學(xué)上都有顯著(zhù)的意義。這個(gè)結果可以說(shuō)明復健治療對于中風(fēng)病人的預后結果扮演重要的
正面角色。影響出院時(shí)FIM量表得分的重要預測因子包括年齡、多次中風(fēng)病史、住院期間多
項并發(fā)癥、定向能力異常及神經(jīng)心理功能異常暨失智癥等；而感覺(jué)異常和多次中風(fēng)病史患
者是影響住院期間功能獨立自主量表進(jìn)步量的重要預測因子。
住院時(shí)FIM量表平均得分57.7 ± 24.5；出院前77.3 ± 26.3。住院期間復健效率平均得分
0.7 ± 0.7和復健效果30.6 ± 24.0%。對于復健治療效率而言，在統計學(xué)上有意義的預測
因子包括復健治療住院天數和患側上肢近端肢體運動(dòng)功能恢復級數，兩項因素可以解釋復
健治療效率21%的變異量；對于復健治療效果而言，在統計學(xué)上有意義的預測因子包括年齡
和患側上肢近端肢體運動(dòng)功能恢復級數，兩項因素可以解釋復健治療效果24%的變異量。
住院初期以福格-米勒平衡量表(Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale, FMBS)評估平衡能力可以解釋
接受復健治療住院天數6%的變異量及復健治療效率3%的變異量；然而，平衡能力無(wú)法提供
解釋住院期間FIM得分進(jìn)步情形的變異量。這些結果說(shuō)明住院復健初期臨床使用FMBS量表來(lái)
評估平衡能力似乎無(wú)法有效預測中風(fēng)病患接受復健治療預后功能結果。
住院時(shí)FIM量表得分能力、是否肩關(guān)節有半脫位、是否兩側肢體運動(dòng)功能皆受損和接受教育
年數是為住院天數長(cháng)短的的重要預測因子。這些重要預測因子可以解釋住院天數長(cháng)短21.5%
的變異量。這些結果可以做為未來(lái)腦中風(fēng)患者接受住院復健治療健保給付規劃論病例計酬
標準的參考。
出院半年后共完成142位個(gè)案日常生活狀態(tài)的追蹤訪(fǎng)視，結果發(fā)現訪(fǎng)視時(shí)日常生活功能完全
獨立者共有23位(16.2%)。住院時(shí)加拿大神經(jīng)量表(Canadian Neurological Scale, CNS)得
分能力和住院時(shí)FIM量表得分能力可為中風(fēng)病患復健治療出院半年后生活功能是否獨立自主
的重要預測因子。
有關(guān)使用長(cháng)期照護機構方面，這部份共完成151位個(gè)案的追蹤訪(fǎng)視。結果發(fā)現訪(fǎng)視時(shí)正住在
長(cháng)期照護機構者共有23位(15.2%)。邏輯回歸分析結果發(fā)現，兩側肢體運動(dòng)功能是否皆受損
、出院時(shí)意識狀況是否正常和平衡量表得分能力是為最佳預測變項。
有關(guān)預后生活型態(tài)改變的追蹤研究，這部份以出院至少半年后芙蘭切活動(dòng)量表(Frenchay
Activities Index, FAI)及FIM量表評估結果做為預后全面性日常生活活動(dòng)分析數據。結果
顯示比較發(fā)病前和出院至少半年后訪(fǎng)視時(shí)FAI量表及其三大項目(做家務(wù)事、戶(hù)外活動(dòng)及休
閑工作)得分的退步量在統計學(xué)上都有顯著(zhù)的差異性。發(fā)病前和訪(fǎng)視時(shí)FAI量表得分皆與年
齡呈負相關(guān)性(Pearson r = - 0.24, p< 0.05; r = -0.34, p< 0.001)；訪(fǎng)視時(shí)FAI量表得
分和FIM量表得分呈顯著(zhù)正相關(guān)性(Pearson r = 0.58, p< 0.001)。這些結果說(shuō)明使用FAI
量表可以量化腦中風(fēng)患者預后生活型態(tài)變化的情形。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
【英文摘要】
The purposes of this prospective study were to investigate the clinical
profile, rehabilitation effectiveness and the functional outcomes at
discharge, to investigate predictive variables of length of rehabilitative
stay, to identify the prognostic factors about functional independence and
long-term care institution utilization, and to investigate the lifestyle
change and analysis of the related factors, at least 6 months after
discharge
for stroke patients following rehabilitation therapy. A total of 163
stroke
patients who were consecutively admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation
department at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in 1997 were included
in
this study.
The results indicated that Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score at
discharge and gains were used as the index of prognosis. Statistical
analyses
indicated that significant improvement in each FIM subscale scores was
noted.
Significant predictors of discharge FIM scores include age, previous
attacks
twice or over, medical comorbidities, sensory and orientation impairments,
and
dementia. In addition, previous stroke attacks twice or over and sensory
impairment were significant predictors of FIM gains during rehabilitation
period.
The mean FIM score was 57.7 ± 24.5 at admission versus 77.3 ± 26.3 at
discharge. The mean rehabilitation efficiency (0.7 ± 0.7) and
effectiveness (
30.6 ± 24.0%) of stroke rehabilitation were determined. Rehabilitation
efficiency and rehabilitation effectiveness were significantly predicted
by
length of rehabilitation stay and arm motor recovery stage, and by age and
arm
motor recovery stage, respectively. The variance explained only 21% of the
rehabilitation efficiency and 24% of the achievement of rehabilitation
potential.
The Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale (FMBS) score at admission accounted for 6% of
the
variation in length of stay, once demographic influences were controlled.
The
FIM efficiency score could possibly be predicted by the balance ability at
admission, which accounted for 3% of the variance. However, the balance
score
could not provide predictive information about the FIM gain with
demographic
factors controlled. These findings suggest that the use of FMBS at
admission
to stroke inpatient rehabilitation seemed not to enhance the ability to
predict rehabilitation outcomes.
Admission FIM score, shoulder subluxation, bilateral limbs involvement and
the
level of education significantly predicted length of stay (LOS). But, the
variance of the LOS was explained only 21.5%. The results of this study
suggest that these objective predictors can be used as the basis of
reimbursement for stroke rehabilitation in case payment system in the
future.
Of the 142 subjects surveyed at least 6-month follow-up visit after
discharge,
23 (16.2%) stroke patients had been functional independence outcome at
home.
The results of this study suggest the usefulness of the admission Canadian
Neurological Scale (CNS) and FIM scores in the prediction of functional
independence outcome for stroke survivors following rehabilitation
therapy.
Of the 151 subjects surveyed at least 6-month follow-up visit after
discharge,
23 (15.2%) patients had been living in long-term care institutions.
Whether
they had (1) limbs bilaterally affected, (2) impaired orientation, or (3)
poor
standing ability at discharge were the strongest predictors of long-term
care
institution utilization for stroke patients following rehabilitation
therapy.
FIM instrument and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) as comprehensive
assessment
of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were measured at least 6 months
following
the onset of stroke. Significant differences were observed in the FAI
subscore (domestic chores, outdoor activities, and leisure/work
activities)
between prestroke and poststroke status at interview. FAI scores at
prestroke
and poststroke status were negatively correlated (r =- 0.24, p < 0.05;
r=-0.
35, p<0.001) with age; FAI score was positively correlated (r = 0.58, p <
0.
001) with FIM score. The findings indicated that FAI score is useful as a
quantitative index of the lifestyle change on the prognosis for stroke
patients.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
【 目 錄 】
目 錄
博士論文總摘要 1~3
Abstract of Dissertation 4~7
第一章 緒論：前言、文獻探討及本研究目的和規畫(huà) 1-1~14
第二章 腦中風(fēng)患者的臨床數據和功能恢復情況的研究 2-1~16
第三章 腦中風(fēng)患者復健治療預后的初步研究3-1~24
第四章 初次中風(fēng)病人復健治療的效率和效果4-1~18
第五章 腦中風(fēng)患者住院時(shí)平衡能力和預后功能的關(guān)系 5-1~13
第六章 影響腦中風(fēng)患者復健治療住院天數長(cháng)短的因素 6-1~16
第七章 影響腦中風(fēng)患者預后功能獨立的因素 7-1~16
第八章 影響腦中風(fēng)患者預后使用長(cháng)期照護機構的因素 8-1~16
第九章 腦中風(fēng)患者預后生活型態(tài)改變的追蹤研究 9-1~17
第十章 結論：研究成果與未來(lái)展望 10-1~13
附錄一：功能獨立自主量表(Functional Independence Measure, FIM)
附錄二：福格-米勒平衡量表(Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale, FMBS)
附錄三：加拿大神經(jīng)量表(Canadian Neurological Scale, CNS)
附錄四：芙蘭切活動(dòng)量表(Frenchay Activities Index, FAI)
附錄五：本研究相關(guān)論文發(fā)表成果
表目錄
INDEX OF TABLE
表2-1. 163位中風(fēng)病患的基本人口學(xué)數據
Demographic data of 163 stroke patients
表2-2. 住院期間臨床診斷檢查和評估數據
Clinical and diagnostic factors of 163 stroke patients
表2-3. 住院期間功能獨立量表主要項目得分和進(jìn)步量
Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient
rehabilitation
表2-4. 接受復健治療前后步行及生活能力獨立狀況的人數比較
Comparison of number of persons with ambulation and ADL independence
following rehabilitation therapy
表3-1. 147位中風(fēng)病患的基本人口學(xué)數據
Demographic data of 147 stroke patients
表3-2. 住院期間臨床診斷檢查和評估數據
Clinical and diagnostic factors of 147 stroke patients
表3-3. 住院期間功能獨立量表主要項目得分和進(jìn)步量
Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient
rehabilitation
表3-4. 皮爾森相關(guān)系數分析序位/等距變項和預后功能的間的相關(guān)性
Pearson correlation for ordinal/interval variables considered in
predicting functional outcome
表3-5. Student's t-test 檢定類(lèi)別變項和預后功能結果的間的差異性
Student's t-test for nominal variables on functional outcome of stroke
patients
表3-6. 類(lèi)別變項和預后功能的間的變異數分析
Analysis of variance for nominal variables on functional outcome
表3-7. 復回歸分析預測中風(fēng)病人出院FIM量表得分的結果
Multiple regression analysis predicting discharge FIM score
表3-8. 復回歸分析預測中風(fēng)病人FIM量表進(jìn)步量的結果
Multiple regression analysis predicting FIM improvement
表4-1. 110位初次中風(fēng)病患的基本人口學(xué)和臨床診斷檢查數據
Clinical and demographic data of first 110 stroke patients
表4-2. 住院期間功能獨立量表主要項目得分和進(jìn)步量
Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient
rehabilitation
表4-3. 皮爾森相關(guān)系數分析序位/等距變項和預后功能的間的相關(guān)性
Pearson correlation analysis between ordinal/interval
variables and rehabilitation outcome
表4-4. Student's t-test 檢定類(lèi)別變項和預后功能結果的間的差異性
Difference between nominal variables and rehabilitation outcome as
assessed by Student's t-test
表4-5. 復回歸分析預測110位初次中風(fēng)病人復健治療的效率和效果
Multiple regression analyses predicting rehabilitation outcome in 110
patients with first stroke
表5-1. 163位中風(fēng)病患的基本數據
Basic data of 163 stroke patients
表5-2. 皮爾森相關(guān)系數分析平衡能力和住院時(shí)FIM量表得分及預后 功能間的相
關(guān)性
Pearson's correlation analyses between balance score and FIM score and
rehabilitation outcome
表5-3. 復回歸分析剛住院時(shí)平衡能力得分和預后功能結果的關(guān)系
Multiple regression analyses between admission balance score
and rehabilitation outcomes
表6-1. 中風(fēng)病患的基本數據 (n=163)
Basic data of 163 stroke patients
表6-2. Pearson 相關(guān)系數檢定住院天數長(cháng)短和等距變項的相關(guān)性
Pearson correlation analysis between ordinal/interval variables and
length of rehabilitation stay
表6-3. Student's t-test 檢定住院天數長(cháng)短和類(lèi)別變項的差異性
Difference between nominal variables and length of rehabilitation stay
as
assessed by Student's t-test
表6-4. 相關(guān)影響因素對住院天數長(cháng)短的復回歸分析
Multiple regression analyses predicting length of rehabilitation stay
表7-1. 中風(fēng)病人預后功能獨立與否兩組間相關(guān)變項的差異性比較
Comparison of prospective factors between patients with functional
independence or dependence
表7-2. 預后功能獨立與否的影響因素及關(guān)聯(lián)程度的檢定
Associations between prospective factors and functional independence
表7-3. 影響中風(fēng)病患預后功能獨立與否的最佳預測因子
Selected predictors influencing functional independence outcome
表8-1. 151位中風(fēng)病患的基本數據
Basic data of 151 stroke patients
表8-2. 出院后使用長(cháng)期照護機構的影響因素及關(guān)聯(lián)程度的檢定
Associations between prospective factors and utilization of long-term
care institution
表8-3. 影響中風(fēng)病患出院后使用長(cháng)期照護機構的最佳預測因子
Selected predictors influencing utilization of long-term care
institution
表9-1. 104位首次中風(fēng)病患的基本數據
Basic data of 104 first stroke patients
表9-2. 中風(fēng)患者芙蘭切活動(dòng)量表分數變化情形
FAI change on subscale and total score between prestroke and
post-stroke
表9-3. 類(lèi)別變項對于中風(fēng)患者出院至少半年后FAI量表得分退步的 影響
Difference between nominal variables and FAI change as assessed by
Student's t-test
表9-4. 中風(fēng)病發(fā)前和出院至少半年后訪(fǎng)視時(shí)FAI量表得分及退步量
與年齡、教育年限及訪(fǎng)視時(shí)FIM量表分數的相關(guān)性
Pearson's correlation between prestroke FAI score, post-stroke FAI
score
at visit, and FAI change and age, the years of
education, and FIM score at visit
圖目錄
INDEX OF FIGURE
圖 1-1. 研究體系結構：中風(fēng)病人復健治療預后預測因子和功能結果
Research framework：predictors and functional outcomes for
post-stroke patients following rehabilitation therapy
圖9-1. 中風(fēng)患者發(fā)病前芙蘭切量表得分分布
Histogram with normal curve superimposed over the
distribution of Frenchay Activities Index total score at pre-stroke
圖9-2. 中風(fēng)患者預后訪(fǎng)視時(shí)芙蘭切量表得分分布
Histogram with normal curve superimposed over the
distribution of Frenchay Activities Index total score at post-stroke
論文關(guān)鍵字：
【腦中風(fēng)患者接受住院復健治療預后功能的研究】相關(guān)文章：
人性化護理干預對改善胃癌手術(shù)患者預后的影響12-06
阿司匹林聯(lián)合他汀類(lèi)藥物對老年腦血栓患者預后的影響03-16
研究老年代謝綜合征患者認知功能障礙的特點(diǎn)03-19
恩替卡韋治療拉米夫定失效慢性乙肝患者研究01-09
呼吸機治療危重患者體會(huì )03-19
住院手術(shù)患者抗生素使用狀況分析11-20
急性腦出血早期血糖水平及其預后關(guān)系研究03-08
研究針灸治療肥胖03-19