2016年6月GMAT邏輯機經(jīng):老房子和新房子
V1
一個(gè)鎮子上的老房子的質(zhì)量都比新建的房子的質(zhì)量好，維修次數少，依然堅挺神馬的。于是鎮上的老人家認為，現在的房子粗制濫造偷工減料。
以下哪個(gè)選項weaken了老人的結論?
Lz選 當年質(zhì)量不好的老房子現在都塌了 所以你沒(méi)看到
考古
V1
有人說(shuō)現在房子的質(zhì)量不好了，原來(lái)的房子好。問(wèn)一個(gè)解釋/加強
參考：質(zhì)量不好的老房子隨年代已經(jīng)坍塌
V2
某年代的老房子普遍比現在的房子質(zhì)量好，因此推斷出那時(shí)候的建筑工更厲害。問(wèn)：削弱
V3
說(shuō)一個(gè)人發(fā)現建的早的房子比新造的房子堅固，所以以前的人的造房子工藝比較好。削弱題。狗主選項：選D，建造的早但是不堅固的都已經(jīng)倒了
原文邏輯鏈：(確認和OG12上面114題十分相似)老房子質(zhì)量好推出當時(shí)的建筑工更厲害
變體：選項是反著(zhù)說(shuō)的 就是 質(zhì)量不好的都倒拉拆掉了之類(lèi)的
OG中類(lèi)似題
OG12-CR-114.
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
The correct answer is D.
【6月GMAT邏輯機經(jīng):老房子和新房子】相關(guān)文章：
2016年GMAT邏輯機經(jīng):老房子和新房子10-02
GMAT語(yǔ)法機經(jīng)精選03-03
GMAT機經(jīng)2016解讀12-16